Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Wife’s share from the AdB (by an open offer, if she chooses to accept it)
- Wife’s share from her own resources (as found by the court)
- Wife’s share from the husband (pursuant to the court order)
- Wife’s share from the husband’s parents (voluntarily provided)
Article summary
Family analysis: James Ewins QC at Queen Elizabeth Building points out that in financial remedies cases, such as HRH Tessy Princess of Luxembourg v HRH Louis Prince of Luxembourg, even a prince has his budget analysed and even a princess is expected to rely upon her reasonable earning capacity.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial