Legal News

Personal Injury weekly highlights—6 June 2019

Published on: 06 June 2019

Table of contents

  • Key PI updates
  • Unpicking fundamental dishonesty
  • Occupational disease claims
  • Exploring claim for ‘lost years’ in asbestos-related mesothelioma case
  • Part 36
  • Interest-exclusive Part 36 offers in detailed assessment proceedings
  • What makes a Part 36 offer ‘unjust’?
  • Novel Part 36 offer on hourly rates only, denied additional amount under CPR 36.17(4)(d)
  • Costs
  • CPR 3.14 sanction—client remained liable for costs and so to recovery of same from opponent
  • More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.

Article summary

This week’s edition of Personal Injury highlights includes analysis of the High Court decision in Patel v Arriva Midlands, which provides helpful guidance within the judgment as to when oral evidence of witnesses and expert evidence should be tested before a finding of fundamental dishonesty can be made. We have our usual round-up of other key cases and news as well as webinar dates for your diaries.

Popular documents