Weekly highlights

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Lexis+® UK PI & Clinical Negligence produces a weekly highlights document that gathers together key news analysis reports

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest PI & Clinical Negligence News

HMCTS announces mandation of the OCMC pilot and automatic referral to mediation for non-injury RTA claims

Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has announced that from 28 July 2025, the Online Civil Money Claims (OCMC) pilot in CPR PD 51R will be mandatory for eligible claims where the parties are represented. This is provided for in the 187th Practice Direction update to the CPR. In addition, this update includes the introduction of a one-year pilot for automatic referral to mediation for non-personal injury road traffic accident (RTA) claims issued through the OCMC service. HMCTS will evaluate the pilot and conduct a public consultation to inform future policy decisions regarding mandatory mediation.

Event to mark the 25th anniversary of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee and to launch the work of the Online Procedure Rule Committee

On 16 July 2025, the Master of the Rolls and Lord Justice Birss gave speeches at an event hosted by the Ministry of Justice and The Law Society. The event marked the 25th anniversary of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) and launched the public engagement work carried out by the Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC).

When employment duties extend beyond the clock—employer liability and Sanderson orders (Pashamov v Taylor & another)

PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: A farm worker suffered serious injuries when he was struck by a car when crossing the road. The claimant had been travelling back from the field to his lodgings on a company bus and had left the bus to tell employees on the other side of the road to get on. The judge dismissed the claim against the car driver, but the worker succeeded against his employer. The judge held that he had been engaged in activities incidental to his employment. The judge made a Sanderson order against the employer. It was ordered to pay both the driver’s costs and the costs the claimant had incurred against the driver in turn. Written by David Juckes, barrister at Hailsham Chambers.

PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights—24 July 2025

This week’s edition of PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights includes the Civil Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2025, SI 2025/893, which update procedures for the CE-File electronic case system. The NHS published its annual report and accounts for 2024/25, revealing that 83% of clinical compensation claims were resolved out of court, with over 11,000 settled via alternative dispute resolution. We take a look at silicosis claims, focusing on the risks of prolonged exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and employer liability. We also feature a recent High Court decision that found the claimant was responsible for his own injuries during a snowmobile accident. In addition, we have our usual round-up of other news, cases, webinars and New Law Journal articles of interest.

View PI & Clinical Negligence by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS)

Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS)NOTE: the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2023, SI 2023/105, amended CPR 44.14 so that defendants can enforce costs orders made against claimants up to the level of any damages or costs recovered by claimants. The amendments to qualified one-way costs

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of caseA strike out order can be made either following an application by the parties or on the court's own initiative. This Practice Note deals with the scenario of the order being made following a party's application.Making an application
Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS)

Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS)

Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS)NOTE: the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2023, SI 2023/105, amended CPR 44.14 so that defendants can enforce costs orders made against claimants up to the level of any damages or costs recovered by claimants. The amendments to qualified one-way costs

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of caseA strike out order can be made either following an application by the parties or on the court's own initiative. This Practice Note deals with the scenario of the order being made following a party's application.Making an application