Table of contents
- Key PI developments
- Public path was a highway maintainable at public expense
- Law Commission consultation identifies ten focal areas in relation to automated vehicles
- Proving negligence
- Likelihood of criminal attack occurring in hotel was extremely low
- Regulation of medical professionals
- Medical practitioner—disciplinary proceedings
- Case management
- Claimant successfully appeals summary judgment
- All proceedings orders—restricting vexatious legal proceedings
More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.
Article summary
This week’s edition of Personal Injury highlights includes the judgment of Barlow v Wigan Council which found that a public path was a highway maintainable at public expense even though there was no evidence that it was intended to be a highway when it was constructed. We also have the Law Commission’s analysis of the responses they received to their consultation paper into issues around driving laws for automated vehicles. We have our usual round-up of other key cases and news as well as webinar dates for your diaries and some recent Q&As.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial