Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide and why?
Article summary
Family analysis: Daniel Sokol, barrister at 12 King’s Bench Walk, considers what the decision in Joy v Joy might mean for the adjournment of capital claims in cases where the court is concerned with issues of conduct and a lack of disclosure.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial