- Court lifts veil of confidentiality on ‘in private’ proceedings (Bloom v Bloom)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Family analysis: Harry Oliver, barrister at 1 King’s Bench Walk Chambers, who represented the applicant, says Bloom v Bloom serves as a timely reminder and reinforcement of the view that the family courts have many tools available to root out undisclosed assets, and that cheats cannot be assured of prospering.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial