Legal News

Court lifts veil of confidentiality on ‘in private’ proceedings (Bloom v Bloom)

Published on: 27 March 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Court lifts veil of confidentiality on ‘in private’ proceedings (Bloom v Bloom)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?

Article summary

Family analysis: Harry Oliver, barrister at 1 King’s Bench Walk Chambers, who represented the applicant, says Bloom v Bloom serves as a timely reminder and reinforcement of the view that the family courts have many tools available to root out undisclosed assets, and that cheats cannot be assured of prospering. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents