Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Article summary
Family analysis: Harry Oliver, barrister at 1 King’s Bench Walk Chambers, who represented the applicant, says Bloom v Bloom serves as a timely reminder and reinforcement of the view that the family courts have many tools available to root out undisclosed assets, and that cheats cannot be assured of prospering.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial