Innovator Founder

The Innovator Founder route was introduced from 13 April 2023. It replaced the Innovator and Start-up routes, which had come into force in March 2019 for applicants wishing to set up a business in the UK (and had replaced respectively the Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) and the Tier 1 (Graduate Entrepreneur) routes). Start-up was a two-year route aimed at those setting up a business for the first time, and did not require any minimum investment funds, while the Innovator route had a minimum funds requirement of £50,000 but led to settlement. Both routes required endorsement by a Home Office-approved third party endorsing body (which in the case of Start-up was often a higher education institution).

The 2019 changes were brought in broadly to address the 2015 Migration Advisory Committee’s review of the Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) and Tier 1 (Graduate Entrepreneur) categories. The Explanatory Memorandum to the relevant Statement of Changes commented on the findings of the Migration Advisory Committee’s review, stating that the Entrepreneur category was in need of ‘substantial reform’ and ‘contributed little or nothing to the UK economy’. It also stated that central to the Innovator route would

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Immigration News

Lords Committee criticises lack of advance information on immigration policy changes

The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee has criticised the Home Office for failing to provide sufficient information in support of measures set out in its latest Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules HC 977, which sets out significant changes to immigration policy. The Statement tightens the Skilled Worker visa route by removing care workers/senior care workers from the list of occupations eligible to recruit migrant workers form overseas and tightens conditions for granting Skilled Worker visas—affecting around 180 occupations (which could lead to a 40 drop in grants). The Committee highlighted the lack of consultation and the absence of an impact assessment, which it says severely undermines parliamentary scrutiny. It called for the impact assessment to be published before the end of the current summer recess. The Statement also closes two schemes which assisted Afghans who supported UK operations and aims in Afghanistan, including through resettlement. A submission to the Committee argued this would permanently abandon people in need, especially in light of a 2022 data breach recently revealed through the lifting of a superinjunction. The Home Office responded that most eligible applicants had already applied and that 95% of current applications were found ineligible. The report states that the Committee had previously repeatedly requested the Home Office to provide sufficient information when laying new legislation with potentially significant consequences, but ‘despite acknowledging this to be correct practice’ it had failed to do so again. It includes a link to detailed submissions sent to the Committee by the Work Rights Centre, the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association and the Home Office.

View Immigration by content type :

Popular documents