Global Talent

Global Talent

The Global Talent route is designed to attract leaders in their field in certain disciplines, or those who have the potential to become leaders. These disciplines cover:

•
arts and culture (including architecture, fashion design, and film and television)
•
digital technology, and
•
science, engineering, humanities and medicine

The route is now found in the Immigration Rules, Appendix Global Talent, which came into force on 1 December 2020 and was introduced by Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules HC 813. It was previously contained in Appendix W of the Immigration Rules, and had largely replaced the Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) route, which was closed to new applicants and those

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Immigration News

Home Office allocates £600,000 to Windrush Compensation Advocacy Support Fund

The Home Office has announced that £600,000 has been allocated for the second year of the three-year £1.5m Windrush Compensation Advocacy Support Fund (WCASF), which was launched in April 2025. The funding is intended to provide dedicated advocacy support to individuals affected by the Windrush scandal, helping them navigate the compensation claims process. Community organisations interested in applying can attend virtual information sessions on 15 and 23 January 2026, with applications to be submitted via the Find and Apply Grant portal by 6 February 2026. The fund aims to assist claimants in articulating their experiences, gathering supporting evidence and accessing additional services through advocates who understand their cultural background.

Immigration—Windrush—non-fettering public law principle—section 31(2A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Hippolyte v SSHD)

Immigration analysis: The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal of the High Court’s refusal of judicial review in respect of the respondent Secretary of State’s refusal to grant the applicant indefinite leave to remain (ILR) under the Windrush Scheme. The Home Office’s casework guidance states that the child of a Commonwealth citizen who was settled in the UK before 1 January 1971 must have been continuously resident in the UK since their birth or arrival to qualify under the scheme. The applicant asked the Secretary of State to exercise discretion to waive this requirement, as she had sufficient close ties to the UK that she fell within the ‘spirit’ of the Windrush Scheme. The Home Office failed to consider whether to exercise discretion and the appellant argued that the Home Office had fettered its discretion. The case concerned two key issues: (1) whether the Secretary of State contravened the ‘non-fettering’ principle in public law by failing to exercise her discretion under section 3(1)(b) Immigration Act 1971, which confers a wide discretion on the Home Office to grant leave even where the requirements of the Immigration Rules or published policy guidance are not met, and (2) whether the High Court was wrong to refuse relief under section 31(2A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981), which applies where it is highly likely that the outcome for the claimant would not have been substantially different had the conduct complained of not occurred. Written by Gill McKearney, knowledge lawyer at Bates Wells.

UNHCR cautions against impact of UK asylum reforms on refugees

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has published its observations on the UK Government’s asylum and returns policy statement and warns that several proposed reforms could undermine refugee protection and integration, while also welcoming the UK’s commitment to non-refoulement and to maintaining safe and legal routes.

Academic analysis examines Labour's proposed asylum appeals system overhaul

UK in a Changing Europe has published academic analysis of the Home Secretary's November 2025 'Restoring Order and Control' policy, examining the proposed reforms. The analysis details plans to replace the current multi-layered appeals system with a single appeal process, where all grounds including asylum, humanitarian protection, human rights claims and new evidence must be raised simultaneously. A new Independent Appeals Body staffed by specially trained adjudicators will hear cases, with decisions intended to be final. The reforms will narrow Article 8 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) family-life claims to cases involving minor children or dependent parents, restrict Article 3 ECHR health-based removal challenges, and reduce weight given to late modern slavery or trafficking claims. Appeals involving accommodation or foreign-national offenders will be expedited. The analysis notes the current system costs over £5bn annually and has a backlog of 51,000 asylum appeals with 54-week average waiting times, while 48% of First-tier Tribunal appeals succeed.