Business development strategy

Every law firm, regardless of size or specialism, must actively develop new business if it is to survive and grow. The legal market in the UK is increasingly competitive, clients are more informed and cost-conscious and they are increasingly willing to switch between law firms. Reputation alone is no longer enough to guarantee a steady flow of work.

A successful firm requires a clear business development strategy, supported by realistic plans, appropriate systems and consistent management. It is no longer a reliable or sustainable strategy to rely on individual solicitors who naturally attract work through their personal reputation and contacts.

Business development is no longer optional for law firms. A structured approach

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Practice Management News

National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Lords agree increase in salary sacrifice cap to £5,000

Pensions analysis: The House of Lords considered the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill at Report stage on 5 March 2026. The principal debates concerned non-government amendments to Clause 1, relating to employer pension contributions under optional remuneration arrangements in Great Britain, and Clause 2, which makes equivalent provision for Northern Ireland. The House of Lords agreed amendments increasing the cap from £2,000 to £5,000, exempting basic rate taxpayers, protecting student loan calculations, exempting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and charities, and strengthening parliamentary scrutiny of regulations, all of which the government had opposed on grounds of fiscal sustainability, fairness within the national insurance system, and administrative operability. Following the end of the Report Stage, a revised Bill was published on 5 March 2026 and it now moves to its Third Reading in the House of Lords on 12 March 2026.

Government to proceed with proposals in LGPS Access and Fairness consultation

Pensions analysis: On 2 February 2026, the government published its response to its consultation on access and fairness in the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) in England and Wales, confirming that it will proceed with the proposals with some modifications following feedback from administering authorities, employers and other stakeholders. The government will introduce the changes through one or more statutory instruments, supported by detailed guidance developed with bodies such as the LGPS Scheme Advisory Board, the Local Government Association (LGA), the Government Actuary’s Department, and the Local Government Pension Committee (LGPC). Written by Paul Carney, partner at Shoosmiths.

Part-time army reservists as ‘workers’—whether less favourable treatment (Advocate-General for Scotland v Milroy)

Pensions analysis: The claimant, a part-time reservist, brought a complaint under the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 alleging he had been treated less favourably than a full-time regular soldier as respects (a) for pension purposes, his service prior to 1 April 2015 and (b) his daily rate of pay. The Employment Tribunal found in the claimant’s favour. The Advocate-General for Scotland appealed, contending that the claimant was not a ‘worker’ within the Regulations, his daily rate of pay did not constitute less favourable treatment and his treatment as respects pay and prior service was not on the ground that he was a part-time worker. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) dismissed the appeal, holding that the tribunal below had not erred in law. The case applies the recognised principles for determining whether a person without an employment contract is a ‘worker’ to the new context of the armed forces. It is potentially relevant to all armed forces reservists. Written by Elizabeth Ovey, barrister at Radcliffe Chambers.

MoD loses appeal over army reservist's right of access to pension scheme

Law360: An appeals tribunal has rejected the Ministry of Defence (MoD)'s attempt to overturn a ruling that it treated a long-standing part-time army reservist less favourably than full-time personnel by excluding him from the army pension scheme.

View Practice Management by content type :

News