Table of contents
- The background
- The challenge
- Did the Appellant waive its right to claim that the arbitration agreement was invalid?
- Did the court address the separability of the arbitration clause?
- What lessons can be learned from this case?
Article summary
The Swedish Supreme Court (SSC) recently upheld a decision of the Svea Court of Appeal that a party had waived its right to rely on the alleged invalidity of an arbitration agreement for the purposes of challenging an arbitral award issued by a tribunal under the arbitration rules of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC). The SSC’s decision is a reminder for parties and practitioners that challenging the validity of an arbitration agreement must be done in a proper and timely manner in accordance with the governing procedural law of the arbitration.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial