Table of contents
- Original news
- What issues did this case raise?
- To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law in this area?
- Are there any grey areas or unresolved issues that practitioners need to watch out for? If so, how can they avoid potential problems?
- What are the implications of this case for practitioners?
- Are there any patterns or trends emerging in the law in this area?
- Do you have any predictions for future developments?
Article summary
Property analysis: While the courts now readily accept that a right to park can be an easement, Lina Mattsson, a property barrister at Hardwicke Chambers, who was involved in the case,says that the law of easements does require clarification and simplification.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial