In order to show that an Easement has been abandoned, the Servient owner must show that the dominant owner had a clear and fixed intention never to:
- •
exercise the right again on their own behalf, or
- •
attempt to pass the right to anyone else
Abandonment where the original use has become impossible
An easement can be presumed abandoned if it is attached to a particular user and that user is no longer possible (for example, if the building to which the easement is attached is demolished). For this principle to apply the dominant land must have undergone a 'radical change in character' or a 'change in identity'. Further, following the Court of Appeal decision in McAdams Homes v Robinson the court must consider whether the use of the redeveloped site would result in a substantial increase or alteration of the burden on the servient land. For further guidance, see Practice Note: Easements—interpreting the use and extent.
If the alteration to the dominant land makes the current enjoyment of the right impossible and clearly demonstrates an intention
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.