Restrictive covenants

A restrictive covenant is a contractual obligation requiring the covenantor not to do the thing specified (such as building on the land or using the land for particular purposes). Unlike positive covenants, the burden of a restrictive covenant is capable of 'running with the land' so that successive owners or occupiers are bound by the restriction.

Covenants restricting the carrying out of certain activities on land imposed by a seller may be divided into three classes:

•
covenants imposed for the seller’s own benefit—these are personal to the seller and are not enforceable by anyone else, unless expressly assigned
•
covenants imposed on or after 1 January 1926 by the seller (as the owner of retained land of which the land being sold formed a part) and intended to protect or benefit the retained land—these are capable of running with the land and may be enforceable without express assignment by the owner for the time being of the land for the benefit of which they were imposed
•
covenants imposed by the seller on a sale of land to various buyers who, with their respective successors in title, are intended

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Property News

Failure to publish section 106 agreement could put planning permission at risk (Greenfields (IOW) Ltd v Isle of Wight Council)

Planning analysis: In Greenfields, the Court of Appeal quashed a grant of planning permission on the ground that the authority failed to publish the section 106 planning obligation prior to granting planning permissionr). Publication of the heads of terms in the planning officer’s report did not constitute substantial compliance, as the heads of terms were not sufficiently detailed to allow the public to know the terms of the planning obligation and to comment on it if they chose to do so. Local planning authorities must publish a proposed or agreed planning obligation before granting planning permission, otherwise, the planning permission is liable to be quashed by the courts. However, it may be possible to avoid quashing if the authority can show that there was substantial compliance with the requirement, and no prejudice was caused. Written by Victoria Searle, principal associate at Browne Jacobson.

The interpretation of the sequential test in retail planning (Tesco v SMBC)

Planning analysis: The primary issue considered by the Court of Appeal in this judgment was whether a local planning authority misunderstood and misapplied the ‘sequential test’ in national and development plan policy for retail development when determining an application for planning permission for a new food store on a site neither in nor on the edge of a town centre. Paragraph 87 of the 2021 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (now para 91 of the updated 2024 version) requires local planning authorities to apply a sequential test with main town centre uses being located in town centres, then edge of centre locations, with out of centre sites being considered if suitable sites are not available. The Court of Appeal decision serves as an important reminder of the difference between policy application which is for the decision maker and policy interpretation which is for the courts. The court sets out its detailed interpretation of para 87 which will be of interest to those involved in retail planning. Written by Sarah Sutherland, practice development lawyer at Burges Salmon LLP.

Property weekly highlights—15 May 2025

This week's edition of Property weekly highlights includes: a new Law Society practice note on climate risk and property transactions, an update from the Law Society on form TA6 following NTSELAT’s withdrawal of its material information guidance, a consultation on draft regulations to alter valuation framework for telecoms leases, a change to permitted development rights that support the installation and operation of off-street electric vehicle charging points and cases on boundary determination, rescission of a declaration of trust, interpretation of the sequential test in national and development plan policy for retail development and the setting aside of a possession order in favour of administrators where the property was subject to a mortgage with receivers already appointed

Scottish Land Commission launches consultation on future land reform

The Scottish Land Commission (SLC) has launched a consultation on the next phase of land reform in Scotland. The consultation invites responses from individuals, community groups, land managers, businesses, and organisations on how land can more effectively support housing, nature, jobs, and local communities. Insights collected will help develop a collective vision for how land in Scotland is owned, used, and managed, and will inform policy development ahead of the proposed new Land Reform Bill. The SLC intends to publish a summary of contributions later in 2025.