Home / Property / Key developments and horizon scanning / Weekly highlights

Legal News

Property weekly highlights—23 August 2018

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published on: 23 August 2018

Published by a LexisNexis Property expert

Table of contents

Property development
Collateral warranty claim time-barred
Joint venture claim fails
Written reasons required for decision to discharge planning condition
Residential property
Valuation of intermediate leasehold interest when underlease extended
Voluntary right to buy pilot
Public land for housing programme transparency paper updated
Easements, rights and covenants
Profits a prendre—determination of boundary of a prescriptive right to fish

More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.

Article summary

This week’s edition of Property highlights includes: cases on collateral warranties, money due under a joint venture agreement concerning redevelopment, written reasons required for discharge of a planning condition, apportionment of a premium paid by an underlessee to extend the underlease and the determination of the boundary of a prescriptive right to fish.

Popular documents

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of caseA strike out order can be made either following an application by the parties or on the court's own initiative. This Practice Note deals with the scenario of the order being made following a party's application.Making an application

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of