Table of contents
- Original news
- What was the background to the case?
- Why did the first respondent introduce the MIR?
- What issues arose for the Supreme Court’s consideration?
- What did the court decide and why?
- Does the court’s judgment clarify the law in this area? Are there any unresolved issues of which practitioners should be aware?
- How does the decision fit in with other developments in this area of law?
- What should lawyers take from the judgment?
Article summary
Immigration analysis: The Supreme Court’s decision on the minimum income requirement (MIR) for partners of non-European Economic Area (EEA) nationals seeking leave to enter is considered by Tony Muman, barrister, at 43 Temple Row Chambers.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial