Financial crime and sanctions

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis

This subtopic contains the following documents:

EU sanctions compliance for financial services

  1. •

    EU sanctions compliance for financial services firms—this Practice Note provides a detailed and practical overview of the EU sanctions framework as it applies to financial services firms. It explains how EU financial sanctions, particularly asset freeze measures, affect the activities and compliance obligations of banks, payment service providers and other financial institutions, including sanctions screening and transaction controls. It also outlines the role of licences and exemptions and the enforcement of EU sanctions. It further examines how sanctions compliance is expected to be integrated into firms’ wider AML/CTF governance and risk frameworks, and considers the role of national competent authorities, the EBA’s sanctions guidelines and the role of AMLA

EU AML/CTF for financial services

  1. •

    AMLA—EU Authority for AML/CTF—this Practice Note considers the EU-level supervisory Authority for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CTF) (AMLA). It sets out AMLA’s role and its legislative underpinnings in Regulation (EU) 2024/1620 establishing the Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism and amending Regulation (EU) 1093/2010,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest EU Law News

New Practice Note—EU sanctions compliance for financial services firms

The LexisNexis EU Law and Financial Services practical guidance teams have published a new Practice Note, in partnership with Dan Shapland and Aline Doussin of Hogan Lovells. This Practice Note provides an overview of the key EU financial sanctions relevant to financial services providers. It addresses EU financial sanctions, particularly asset freeze measures, and the relevant aspects of the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CTF) framework.

EDPB and EDPS adopt joint opinion on EU Digital Omnibus on AI proposal

The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) have adopted a Joint Opinion on the European Commission's Digital Omnibus on AI proposal, which seeks to simplify AI Act implementation. The data protection authorities support streamlining but express concerns that proposed changes could undermine fundamental rights protection. Key concerns include the extension of special category personal data processing (such as ethnicity or health data) for bias detection and correction to all AI system providers and deployers, which they recommend should be limited to circumscribed situations where bias risks are sufficiently serious. The EDPB and EDPS oppose the proposed deletion of registration obligations for AI systems categorised as high-risk, even when providers deem them non-high risk, stating this would significantly undermine accountability. They also express concerns about proposed postponement of core provisions for high-risk AI systems and recommend maintaining the original timeline where possible. The opinion supports EU-level AI regulatory sandboxes but calls for direct involvement of Data Protection Authorities in supervision and clarification of the AI Office's supervisory role to avoid overlap with EDPS supervision of Union institutions.

AFME publishes Q4 2025 Securitisation Data Snapshot

The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) has published its Securitisation Data Snapshot Q4 2025. AFME reports that European securitisation issuance rose in 2025, with €252.3bn issued, a 3.0% increase from 2024. Of this total, €156.3bn was placed (62%), led by Pan-European Collateralised Loan Obligations (CLOs) (€60.5bn), UK RMBS (€25.6bn) and German Auto ABS (€12.9bn). EU placed issuance (excluding CLOs) reached €57.0bn, compared with €38.2bn in the UK.

European Parliament adopts position strengthening EU air passenger rights

The European Parliament has adopted its second-reading position on proposed changes to EU air passenger rights rules, voting to maintain existing protections and rejecting attempts by EU Member States to weaken them. MEPs voted to keep passengers’ right to compensation for flight delays of more than three hours, opposing a proposal by the European Council to apply compensation only after delays of between four-to-six hours depending on flight distance. Parliament is also opposed to lowering compensation amounts, backing levels of between €300 and €600 depending on the length of the flight.

View EU Law by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of caseA strike out order can be made either following an application by the parties or on the court's own initiative. This Practice Note deals with the scenario of the order being made following a party's application.Making an application

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of
Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of caseA strike out order can be made either following an application by the parties or on the court's own initiative. This Practice Note deals with the scenario of the order being made following a party's application.Making an application

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of