Financial crime and sanctions

This subtopic contains the following documents:

EU sanctions compliance for financial services

  1. EU sanctions compliance for financial services firms—this Practice Note provides a detailed and practical overview of the EU sanctions framework as it applies to financial services firms. It explains how EU financial sanctions, particularly asset freeze measures, affect the activities and compliance obligations of banks, payment service providers and other financial institutions, including sanctions screening and transaction controls. It also outlines the role of licences and exemptions and the enforcement of EU sanctions. It further examines how sanctions compliance is expected to be integrated into firms’ wider AML/CTF governance and risk frameworks, and considers the role of national competent authorities, the EBA’s sanctions guidelines and the role of AMLA

EU AML/CTF for financial services

  1. AMLA—EU Authority for AML/CTF—this Practice Note considers the EU-level supervisory Authority for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CTF) (AMLA). It sets out AMLA’s role and its legislative underpinnings in Regulation (EU) 2024/1620 establishing the Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism and amending Regulation (EU) 1093/2010,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest EU Law News

Commission launches consultation to revise the EU Cybersecurity Act and strengthen the EU cybersecurity framework

The European Commission launched a call for evidence to support the preparation of a legislative proposal to revise the EU Cybersecurity Act. The initiative aims to strengthen EU cyber resilience, update the mandate of the EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) and improve the effectiveness of the European Cybersecurity Certification Framework. The Commission noted that the cybersecurity landscape has become significantly more complex and threat‑intensive since the Act’s adoption in 2019, while subsequent EU legislation has expanded ENISA’s tasks beyond its original mandate, creating the need to streamline, simplify and supplement the existing framework to ensure coherence, reduce administrative burdens and improve implementation for businesses and users. The initiative focuses on measures to support a secure and resilient Information and Communication Technology supply chain and the EU cybersecurity industrial base, addresses shortcomings in the certification framework such as slow adoption, unclear roles, limited agility and insufficient clarity on covered risks, including non‑technical factors, and considers alignment with newer instruments such as the Cyber Resilience Act. The Commission outlined policy options ranging from non‑legislative measures to targeted or comprehensive regulatory revision, stating that EU‑level action is required to prevent internal market fragmentation and to secure long‑term economic and social benefits through greater harmonisation, stronger cybersecurity and resilience, more efficient incident response and enhanced protection of fundamental rights, including personal data. The call for evidence will run until 20 June 2025.

View EU Law by content type :

Popular documents