Virtual signings and electronic signatures

This Overview is a guide to the content within the Virtual signings and electronic signatures subtopic in the Technology in banking and finance transactions topic, with links to appropriate materials.

While physical signing meetings still feature in the banking and finance space, they have become rarer, having been replaced in the most part by the virtual execution of documents, including the use of electronic signatures.

Notwithstanding the advancement of technology, it will still be essential to ensure that execution formalities are complied with in each and every banking and finance transaction.

The Law Society has brought together a variety of guidance on the use of virtual execution and electronic signatures, as follows:

  1. Execution of documents by virtual means

  2. Execution of a document using an electronic signature, and

  3. Q&A on how to use electronic signatures and complete virtual executions

It will be important for banking and finance lawyers to ensure that they are familiar with the details of the Law Society guidance so that the final phase of their transactions run smoothly.

See also our: Execution toolkit—a

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Banking & Finance News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Banking & Finance by content type :

Popular documents