US regulatory issues—structured products and securitisation

This overview is a guide to the Banking & Finance content within the US regulatory issues—Structured products and securitisation subtopic, with links to appropriate materials.

The principal regulations that govern structured products and securitisation in the United States (US) are set out below.

Dodd-Frank

Following the financial crisis of the US capital markets in 2008, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (Dodd-Frank) was enacted to increase the regulation of the US financial system.

With respect to derivatives used in structured products, Dodd-Frank:

  1. mandates the registration and regulation of 'swap dealers' and 'major swap participants'

  2. imposes clearing and trade execution requirements on standardised derivative products

  3. requires recordkeeping and data reporting of swaps, including real-time public reporting, and

  4. enhances federal agencies’ oversight over the swaps industry

Dodd-Frank has two key aims:

  1. to remove the threat of a major counterparty failure from the financial system of the kind seen by the collapse of Lehman Brothers or AIG; and

  2. to provide regulators with data as to the size and nature of a market which is globally measured in trillions of US dollars

Dodd-Frank

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Banking & Finance News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Banking & Finance by content type :

Popular documents