Signing

This Overview is a guide to the Banking & Finance content within the Signing subtopic, with links to appropriate materials.

Signing in a loan transaction

Signing is an important milestone in a loan transaction as it is the stage at which the parties execute the agreed versions of the documents and the transaction becomes binding (albeit, in most cases, subject to certain conditions precedent being satisfied).

Once signing has occurred, completion (also sometimes referred to as 'closing') is the next milestone. Completion is the point at which money moves between the parties and the transaction is 'completed'. Conditions precedent will need to be satisfied before completion can occur.

Often, there is a gap between signing and completion which allows the parties to commit to the transaction but leave themselves a bit of time to satisfy the conditions precedent. In other instances, signing and completion may take place on the same day, in which case all the conditions precedent to funding will need to be satisfied before signing and completion.

For more information on what happens during the signing and completion phase in loan transactions, see Practice

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Banking & Finance News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Banking & Finance by content type :

Popular documents