Lending chronology

This overview is a guide to the Banking & Finance content within the Lending chronology subtopic, with links to the appropriate materials.

Loan transactions typically follow a specific chronology which is explained in this overview.

For more information on loan transactions in general, see the Loan transaction toolkit—the Banking & Finance loan transaction toolkit is a guide to loan transactions. It provides an overview of each phase of a loan transaction and the tasks that lawyers are required to complete as part of each phase. The toolkit includes links to Checklists, Precedents (with Drafting Notes), Forms, Practice Notes and an explanation of the key drafting and negotiating points to consider in loan transactions.

Term sheet and mandate phase

Loan transactions typically start with the term sheet and mandate phase. During this phase the parties to a potential transaction will enter into confidentiality arrangements, agree the key terms of the transaction and establish their roles in the deal.

The length of this phase will vary considerably, depending on the complexity and nature of the deal.

What happens during this phase?

At the beginning of a transaction the lender

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Banking & Finance News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Banking & Finance by content type :

Popular documents