CFA & DBA

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

This subtopic explains how the conditional fee agreement (CFA) and damages-based agreement (DBA) regimes operate after 1 April 2013.

CFAs

The CFA regime is the product of sections 44–48 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, which amend section 58 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (CLSA 1990). There are no Conditional Fee Regulations, but CLSA 1990, s 58 should be read in conjunction with:

  1. •

    Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013, SI 2013/689

  2. •

    Recovery of Costs Insurance Premiums in Clinical Negligence Proceedings (No 2) Regulations 2013, SI 2013/739

  3. •

    Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (Commencement No 13) Order 2018, SI 2018/1287

A CFA is not the same as a DBA. Under a CFA, the amount you charge your client for your own fees varies depending on the outcome of their matter. Under a DBA, if the client is successful, you charge a straight percentage of any damages recovered, regardless of what your fees are.

A CFA is:

  1. •

    an agreement with a person providing advocacy or litigation services (ie your firm)

  2. •

    that

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Practice Management News

UK trials sick note reform to boost workforce participation

Law360: The government announced a new pilot programme on 11 July 2025 aimed at overhauling the way workers are signed off sick as part of wider efforts to support people with health conditions back into work.

DBT publishes independent review of Great Britain’s whistleblowing framework

The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) has published an independent review of Great Britain's whistleblowing framework, conducted by Grant Thornton UK LLP, which assessed how effectively the framework meets the objectives of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. Drawing on 67 literature sources, 35 interviews, six focus groups, and secondary data, the research noted an increasing reliance on internal reporting systems and designated person channels. However, it also flagged significant challenges, including subjective legal definitions, obstacles to accessing Employment Tribunal (ET) redress, and a persistent cultural stigma. While some organisations have demonstrated effective response mechanisms, there is an overall inconsistency in how concerns are managed and whistleblowers protected. The report is structured around the key themes of definitions, disclosure routes, responses to concerns, the availability and adequacy of protections, redress through ETs, awareness and guidance, and the cultural impact of whistleblowing.

Solicitor-client costs and CFA enforceability—Substance over form (Richardson & Others v Slater & Gordon UK Ltd)

PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: This case concerned proceedings brought by 224 claimants, seeking assessment of costs deducted from their personal injury settlements under Conditional Fee Agreements (‘CFAs’). Senior Costs Judge Rowley, sitting in the Senior Courts Costs Office, addressed a number of preliminary issues in the dispute. Within those, the court considered the enforceability of the relevant CFAs and the obligations of solicitors to ensure clients are adequately informed. Senior Costs Judge Rowley’s decision serves as a helpful and timely reminder of the standards practitioners must meet when explaining CFA terms to clients, including the relevance of whether clients have read the agreement. Those questions were addressed with respect to a number of relevant pieces of legislation, including the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges Regulations 2013, reg 14 and section 62 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015). This decision also serves as guidance on other pertinent issues, such as the proper approach to determining the reasonableness of success fees, and the degree of precision required within agreements to escape section 74(3) of the Solicitors Act 1974 (SA 1974), which limits solicitor-client costs to the amount recoverable in litigation. Written by Connor Wright, barrister, St Philips Chambers.

Government launches review of parental leave and pay

The government has launched a review of parental leave and pay rights on 1 July 2025, the first stage of which is a call for evidence that will close on 26 August 2025.

View Practice Management by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

Contributory negligence in personal injury claims

Contributory negligence in personal injury claimsContributory negligence is a partial defence which can lead to a discount in damages.Other defences may also be relevant. See Practice Notes: Did the claimant consent to the risk of injury? and Was the claimant involved in an illegal activity?If a

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of
Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

Contributory negligence in personal injury claims

Contributory negligence in personal injury claims

Contributory negligence in personal injury claimsContributory negligence is a partial defence which can lead to a discount in damages.Other defences may also be relevant. See Practice Notes: Did the claimant consent to the risk of injury? and Was the claimant involved in an illegal activity?If a

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of