Green belts

Green belts

Green belts are swathes of land protected from development through policy. The fundamental aim of green belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. The essential characteristics of green belts are their openness and permanence.

See Practice Note: Green belts.

Policy

National policies relating to green belts in England are set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The NPPF states that the government attaches great importance to green belts. There is a general presumption against inappropriate development unless very special circumstances can be demonstrated to show that the benefits of the development will outweigh the harm caused to the green belt. The NPPF sets out what would constitute appropriate development in the green belt. The NPPF was updated in December 2024 to make significant changes to green belt policy in England to enable more development to take place in the green belt in specified circumstances. This is supplemented by Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) on the green belt.

For more information see Practice Note: Development in the green belt.

Wales

In Wales, national planning policy on green belts is set out in Planning

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Planning News

Welsh Government publishes response to review of biodiversity duty implementation

The Welsh Government has published its response to the recommendations from a 2021 review of the section 6 biodiversity duty under the Environment (Wales) Act 2016. The response outlines plans to publish a definitive list of public authorities subject to the duty and confirms that the forthcoming Environment (Principles, Governance and Biodiversity Targets) (Wales) Bill will establish the Office of Environmental Governance Wales (OEGW) to oversee compliance with environmental legislation. Additional measures include enhanced guidance for public authorities, particularly town and community councils, alongside expanded monitoring and reporting requirements. The Welsh Government also intends to refresh section 6 guidance documents to align with the new legislation, with all new and refreshed guidance to be co-designed and co-developed with public authorities.

Court of Appeal clarifies when material considerations arising after a planning appeal inquiry must be taken into account by the decision maker (Re Keep Chiswell Green v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government)

Planning analysis: Once a planning inquiry closes, there may be several months before the decision is determined by the Secretary of State. New matters not raised at the inquiry but material to the appeal may arise or be discovered within such time. The Court of Appeal confirmed that in those circumstances a decision may be irrational, and therefore unlawful, should the decision maker fail to consider any such matter which is ‘so obviously material’. In other words, the matter is one that no reasonable decision maker would have failed to take into account in the circumstances. The irrationality may arise even when the consideration was not drawn to the attention of the decision maker. Written by Brendon Lee, partner at HCR Hewitsons.

Planning Practice Guidance on sequential testing approach in flood risk and coastal change updated

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has updated its Planning Practice Guidance on flood risk and coastal change. The amendments affect paragraphs 23, 27, the new 27a, and 28. Paragraph 23 reiterates that the sequential approach is designed to direct development towards areas with the lowest flood risk. Paragraph 27 clarifies that sequential testing applies to both major and non-major developments in flood risk areas, while also introducing exemptions for certain developments where surface water flood risk can be clearly mitigated. The newly introduced paragraph 27a provides guidance on identifying the appropriate areas of search for sequential testing, stating that the catchment area should be suitable to the nature and scale of the proposal. Finally, paragraph 28 confirms that sites do not need to be owned by the applicant to be deemed ‘reasonably available’ for sequential testing purposes. Although housing land supply considerations may be relevant to overall planning balance, the guidance makes it clear that they do not influence the application of the sequential test.

Statement from Plenary on 16 September 2025 introduces Planning (Wales) Bill and Planning (Consequential Provisions) (Wales) Bill

The Welsh Government has published the record of the Plenary held on 16 September 2025, in which the Counsel General and Minister for Delivery, Julie James MS, made an oral statement on the Planning (Wales) Bill and the Planning (Consequential Provisions) (Wales) Bill. The statement confirmed that both Bills are technical consolidation measures intended to simplify and modernise planning law in Wales, improve clarity and bilingual accessibility, and provide a stronger basis for future reform. The Planning (Wales) Bill consolidates existing legislation into a single statute reflecting Welsh institutions, while the accompanying Bill makes consequential repeals and transitional provisions. The Counsel General emphasised that the Bills are not intended to introduce new policy but to provide a clearer, more accessible framework for future legislative development and public engagement, drawing on the Law Commission’s review of planning law in Wales and the direct involvement of its principal author, Dr Charles Mynors, in the drafting process.