Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of this judgment?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: The Commercial Court varied a worldwide freezing order (WFO) granted after judgment so as to remove from its scope references to assets held by companies in respect of which the respondent was the sole shareholder. The judgment contains a detailed consideration of the scope of WFOs and the meaning of the Commercial Court standard form freezing order wording that extends the definition of ‘assets’ for the purposes of the order. Written by Christopher Snell, barrister at New Square Chambers.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial