Cross-border service—principles

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

This Overview sets out considerations when serving court documents on a defendant situated outside England and Wales (England).

For other considerations when dealing with cross-border service, see: Cross-border service and applications for permission—overview and Cross-border service and problems with service—overview.

Service of court documents is one of many considerations that arise when dealing with a cross-border dispute. For insight into other considerations, see: Cross-border considerations—checklist.

Before determining how to serve documents outside England consider whether there is any basis on which the claim form may be served in England, for example:

  1. •

    consider whether there is a contractually agreed method of service, such that proceedings can be served in the jurisdiction. For guidance, see Practice Note: Service of the claim form by a contractually agreed method (CPR 6.11)

  2. •

    whether service can be effected under the Companies Act 2006 in England. For guidance, see Practice Note: Serving documents under the Companies Act 2006

Note, specific rules apply when serving an arbitration claim form. For guidance, see Practice Note: AA 1996—service of arbitration claims within, and out of, the jurisdiction.

Tools

When dealing

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Court of Appeal implies term as to price of additional product under sale of goods contract (KSY Juice Blends UK Limited v Citrosuco GmbH)

Commercial analysis: This was a sale of goods dispute, in which the parties had agreed the price of a fixed quantity of product, with the price for additional product to be fixed at a later date, in order to allow for market volatility. When the parties did not agree on the price for the additional product, one party used that as an excuse to argue that there was no binding agreement with regard to that additional product.The Commercial Court decided that it was not appropriate to imply a term as to what the price for the additional product should be. There was, therefore, no binding agreement with regard to the additional product.The Court of Appeal has now disagreed and found that, on the facts of this case, a term could be implied into the contract that the price for the additional product should be the reasonable or market price (which, the Court of Appeal said, were the same thing). Dimitris Anassis, partner, and Reema Shour, professional support lawyer, both at Hill Dickinson, consider the court’s decision in KSY Juice Blends UK Ltd v Citrosuco GmbH.

BHP fails to block contempt application in £36bn dam disaster battle

Law360, London: BHP lost its application on 26 June 2025 to block Brazilian municipalities from bringing criminal contempt proceedings in a £36bn case over Brazil's worst environmental disaster, with a London court ruling there were reasonable grounds to argue the mining giant was in contempt.

AmTrust wins disclosure appeal in £56m claim-funding clash

Law360, London: A London appeals court said on 19 June 2025 that AmTrust should be able to see another insurer's communications with two law firms amid a £56m battle over who should cover the costs of a failed litigation-funding scheme.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—26 June 2025

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including Saxon Woods Investments Ltd v Costa (Court of Appeal unfair prejudice decision), The New Lottery Company Ltd v The Gambling Commission (appropriate security for costs applicants), Vietjet Aviation Joint Stock Company v FW Aviation (limits of appellate jurisdiction) and discussion of the potential impact of AI-driven fake evidence in litigation; dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction

Determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdictionThis Practice Note provides an overview into the issues the court will consider during applications in which a party either seeks to establish or challenge the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales (English courts). There

Forum non conveniens—principles

Forum non conveniens—principlesThis Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principlesThis Practice Note considers anti-suit injunctions which are a form of injunctive relief used to restrain a party from either commencing or continuing court proceedings. It explains what an anti-suit injunction is and the power of the courts to grant such an

Hague Service Convention—service outside the jurisdiction

Hague Service Convention—service outside the jurisdictionThis Practice Note considers the Convention on the service abroad of judicial and extra-judicial documents in civil or commercial matters (1965) (the Hague Service Convention). The convention applies between contracting parties and sets out
Determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction

Determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction

Determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdictionThis Practice Note provides an overview into the issues the court will consider during applications in which a party either seeks to establish or challenge the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales (English courts). There

Forum non conveniens—principles

Forum non conveniens—principles

Forum non conveniens—principlesThis Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principlesThis Practice Note considers anti-suit injunctions which are a form of injunctive relief used to restrain a party from either commencing or continuing court proceedings. It explains what an anti-suit injunction is and the power of the courts to grant such an

Hague Service Convention—service outside the jurisdiction

Hague Service Convention—service outside the jurisdiction

Hague Service Convention—service outside the jurisdictionThis Practice Note considers the Convention on the service abroad of judicial and extra-judicial documents in civil or commercial matters (1965) (the Hague Service Convention). The convention applies between contracting parties and sets out