Cross-border ADR

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

This Overview considers cross-border alternative dispute resolution (ADR). ADR provides a confidential dispute resolution mechanism outside of a court of law, by which a dispute or difference is submitted to an impartial individual(s), either for determination or to assist the parties in reaching a negotiated resolution of their dispute.

ADR is only one consideration when dealing with a cross border dispute. For an insight into the various considerations, see: Cross border considerations—checklist.

Tools

  1. •

    understanding the different types of ADR—there are numerous alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms which may be of assistance, eg negotiation, conciliation and arbitration. For an understanding of the different forms and insight into how these differ from litigation, see Practice Note: What is ADR?

  2. •

    guide to cross-border ADR—when dealing with cross border proceedings, such disputes are generally resolved by means of litigation of arbitration. However, it may be appropriate to consider the appropriateness of ADR mechanisms. For guidance, see Practice Note: Cross-border ADR—a guide for dispute resolution practitioners

Arbitration

The

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Sir Geoffrey Vos gives evidence to Lords Constitution Committee on rule of law

The Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice, Sir Geoffrey Vos, appeared before the House of Lords Constitution Committee to provide evidence for their rule of law inquiry. Sir Geoffrey Vos detailed plans to modernise civil justice in England and Wales. He outlined three key priorities: expanding digital platforms in County Court, replacing the CE-File system with AI-enabled case management and developing a pre-court digital justice system. Currently only 11% of County Court cases use digital systems. Sir Geoffrey Vos reported that Civil Automatic Referral to Mediation (CARM) has been implemented for claims under £10,000, with a 37-38% success rate since becoming mandatory.

Decoding arbitral disputes—UK injunctions across borders

Law360, London: This article is part of a monthly column that delves into the most critical cross-border investment and commercial European disputes over arbitral award enforcement. In this installment, I analyze the High Court's reasoning in JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v VTB Bank PJSC.

Afghan nationals prepare to sue Ministry of Defence over data breach

Law360, London: Barings Law is preparing to bring a mass data-breach claim against the Ministry of Defence after the names of Afghans applying to relocate to the UK was inadvertently leaked, it was revealed when a ban that restricted reporting was lifted on 15 July 2025.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—17 July 2025

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including the Court of Appeal decisions in Berge Bulk Shipping PTE Ltd v Taumata Plantations Ltd (undisclosed principals) and Phones 4U Ltd v EE Ltd (appealing delayed judgments); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Applicable law—common law (contract)

Applicable law—common law (contract)This Practice Note considers when the common law of England and Wales is applied to determine the law applicable to contract claims. It sets out the process by which the courts of England and Wales will apply the common law to determine which law is applicable to

Determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction

Determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdictionThis Practice Note provides an overview into the issues the court will consider during applications in which a party either seeks to establish or challenge the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales (English courts). There

Jurisdiction agreements—exclusive jurisdiction agreements

Jurisdiction agreements—exclusive jurisdiction agreementsThis Practice Note considers exclusive jurisdiction agreements (also known as choice of court agreements). Specific considerations as to the construction, effect and enforcement of this type of jurisdiction agreements are discussed.For

Enforcing foreign judgments—common law principles

Enforcing foreign judgments—common law principlesThis Practice Note considers the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments applying common law. It explains the requirement for new enforcement proceedings in England and Wales with the foreign judgment as the cause of action. The Practice Note
Applicable law—common law (contract)

Applicable law—common law (contract)

Applicable law—common law (contract)This Practice Note considers when the common law of England and Wales is applied to determine the law applicable to contract claims. It sets out the process by which the courts of England and Wales will apply the common law to determine which law is applicable to

Determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction

Determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction

Determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdictionThis Practice Note provides an overview into the issues the court will consider during applications in which a party either seeks to establish or challenge the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales (English courts). There

Jurisdiction agreements—exclusive jurisdiction agreements

Jurisdiction agreements—exclusive jurisdiction agreements

Jurisdiction agreements—exclusive jurisdiction agreementsThis Practice Note considers exclusive jurisdiction agreements (also known as choice of court agreements). Specific considerations as to the construction, effect and enforcement of this type of jurisdiction agreements are discussed.For

Enforcing foreign judgments—common law principles

Enforcing foreign judgments—common law principles

Enforcing foreign judgments—common law principlesThis Practice Note considers the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments applying common law. It explains the requirement for new enforcement proceedings in England and Wales with the foreign judgment as the cause of action. The Practice Note