Legal News

Victory for vishing victims

Published on: 29 September 2016

Table of contents

  • Original news
  • What is a vishing scam, the likes of which were used in this fraud?
  • Can you provide some brief background details to the case?
  • What were the relevant sentencing provisions/considerations and how were they applied in this case?
  • What are the practical implications and learning points for corporate crime practitioners from this case?

Article summary

Corporate Crime analysis: On 21 September 2016, nine fraudsters were sentenced for up to seven years each and a total of 27 years for their part in a £113m vishing (voice phishing) scam. Narita Bahra, defence barrister at 2 Hare Court, represented one of the less culpable defendants and explains more.

Popular documents