Table of contents
- Original news
- What is a vishing scam, the likes of which were used in this fraud?
- Can you provide some brief background details to the case?
- What were the relevant sentencing provisions/considerations and how were they applied in this case?
- What are the practical implications and learning points for corporate crime practitioners from this case?
Article summary
Corporate Crime analysis: On 21 September 2016, nine fraudsters were sentenced for up to seven years each and a total of 27 years for their part in a £113m vishing (voice phishing) scam. Narita Bahra, defence barrister at 2 Hare Court, represented one of the less culpable defendants and explains more.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial