Gain streamlined insights on investigating and prosecuting corporate crime with expert guidance on criminal procedure. Stay ahead with crucial elements like case management, pre-trial motions, and procedural safeguards, ensuring your practice stands robust against procedural pitfalls. Understand the nuances of criminal evidence to secure favorable outcomes in corporate crime cases. Acquire key strategies for evidence collection, examination, and admissibility, empowering you to effectively challenge or defend against evidentiary disputes in high-stakes corporate litigation.
Common assault and batteryThe offences of common assault and batteryTechnically, the offences of assault and battery are separate summary offences. An...
AffrayAffray is an offence created by the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986). It can be tried in either the magistrates’ court or the Crown Court. The...
Self defenceSelf defenceSelf defence is an absolute defence based on the evidence which can apply in crimes committed by force. Section 76 of the...
Assault occasioning actual bodily harmThe offence of actual bodily harmThe offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH) can be tried in...
Admissibility of defendant's bad character in criminal proceedingsWhat is bad character?The Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003) governs the admissibility of the 'bad character' of a defendant.The starting point is to identify whether the evidence the prosecution seeks to rely on satisfies the
Good character directions in criminal proceedingsEvidence of a defendant's good character in criminal proceedings is admissible and can go to either propensity or credibility or both:•propensity—the defendant is unlikely to have committed the offence with which they are accused•credibility—the
What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a
If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some
0330 161 1234