The following Corporate Crime practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.
Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.
Prior to the House of Lords decision in Re G there were two types of recklessness, depending on the substantive offence charged. The first type of recklessness was subjective recklessness, that is an accused must have foreseen the risk themselves. The principal was established in the case of R v Cunningham and so this was called ‘Cunningham recklessness’.
The second type of recklessness was known as ‘Caldwell recklessness’ (from the case of R v Caldwell). This required an objective test, that is whether the risk would have been obvious to a reasonable person, irrespective of whether the accused foresaw the risk.
In its decision in Re G, the House of Lords departed from the objective test of recklessness and its earlier decision in Caldwell. It held that foresight of consequences remained an essential ingredient of recklessness in the context of the offence of criminal damage. See further below: Recklessness and Re G.
Although the decision in Re G was in the context of criminal damage, it is clear from the case law that for offences that can be committed recklessly the test will be subjective. The Cunningham test of
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note examines why parties involved in a construction project may enter into an escrow agreement (or escrow deed) to set up an escrow account. It looks at the benefits of paying funds into escrow, how an escrow account operates and the provisions typically found in an escrow
What is rescission of a contract?The remedy of rescission is available to a party whose consent, in entering into a contract, has been invalidated in some way:•the effect of rescinding a contract is to extinguish it and restore the parties to their pre-contractual positions•the main grounds of
Millett LJ subdivided types of constructive trust into two categories, distinguishing between:•the constructive trust proper, where equity intervenes to prevent the legal owner from unconscionably denying the beneficial interest of another (known as the institutional constructive trust)•the
Disposal and devolutionThe equity of redemption arises as soon as the mortgage is made. It is an interest in the land which the mortgagor can:•transfer, lease or mortgage inter vivos, or•by will (it passes on intestacy)No cloggingIt is a fundamental principle of a mortgage that there must be no clog
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.