The following Corporate Crime guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
When an offence does not require proof of a mental element it is an offence of strict liability. There are some common law offences of strict liability (eg public nuisance, outraging public decency and contempt) most though are statutory, arising often under regulatory provisions, eg the sale of food and drink, public health, and licensing. The fact that an offence is one of strict liability may:
be expressly stated in the statute, or
arise by necessary implication as the effect of the statute
Where it is not explicitly stated that an offence is one of strict liability, there is a legal presumption that a mental element has to be established before a person can be found guilty of the offence. The fact that a statute does not specify a mental element is not sufficient by itself to displace the presumption and justify the conclusion that the offence is one of strict liability, although the presumption does not apply to offences which are not truly criminal but acts which are prohibited by a penalty (eg certain summary driving offences such as driving while uninsured). Factors t
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.