The following Corporate Crime guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003) governs the admissibility of the 'bad character' of a defendant.
The starting point is to identify whether the evidence the prosecution seeks to rely on satisfies the definition of 'bad character' as set out in CJA 2003.
This definition is important because if the evidence is 'bad character' within meaning of CJA 2003 it will only be admissible if it falls within specific statutory gateways of admissibility. These gateways do not apply if the evidence is not 'bad character' under CJA 2003; the conduct in question will be admissible without reference to the statutory gateways, subject to the normal principles of relevance and fairness.
'Bad character' is very broadly defined under CJA 2003. It means 'evidence of or a disposition towards misconduct' or other 'reprehensible behaviour'. This will include evidence of previous convictions and cautions. It has also been held to encompass misconduct for which the defendant has never been prosecuted for (see R v J); misconduct for which the defendant has been acquitted (see R v Z) and even misconduct not amounting to a criminal offence (see Saleem).
In R v Renda the court said that the word 'reprehensible' carries with it some element of culpability or blameworthiness.In R v Manister the Court of Appeal held that the trial judge
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234