Table of contents
- Original news
- What is the background to this decision?
- What were the key issues before the court?
- How did the court approach the case?
- What is the significance of this decision?
- How does this compare with the position under English law? How might this affect future cases?
Article summary
Dispute Resolution analysis: Who is the ‘client’ for the purpose of legal privilege? Gareth Hughes, dispute resolution partner at Ashurst Hong Kong, considers the decision in Citic Pacific Limited v Secretary for Justice and the Commissioner of Police by the Hong Kong Courts, which rejects the restrictive approach to determining legal professional privilege claims under English law.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial