Home / Corporate Crime / Money laundering / Money laundering under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Legal News

Shein GC avoids labour abuse claims at UK inquiry

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 09 January 2025
Published by a Law360 reporter

Article summary

Law360, London: Fashion retailer Shein was excoriated by MPs after it offered few answers to accusations of labour abuses in its supply chains at a parliamentary inquiry on 7 January 2025.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

3 Checklists
View More
4 News
View More
5 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

3 Checklists
View More
4 News
View More
5 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As

Popular documents

Money laundering offences—failure to disclose offences

Money laundering offences—failure to disclose offencesFailure to disclose offences under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002There are four separate offences relating to the failure to disclose information under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002):•failing to disclose to a nominated officer or

Money laundering offences—the arrangement offence

Money laundering offences—the arrangement offenceThis Practice Note concerns the arrangement offence under section 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002), which is one of the principal money laundering offences under that Act, see Practice Note: Money laundering offences under the

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some