The following Corporate Crime practice note produced in partnership with Rhys Meggy of QEB Hollis Whiteman provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note discusses the two ‘failure to prevent’ corporate criminal offences created by the Criminal Finances Act 2017 (CFA 2017):
CFA 2017, s 45 creates the offence of failing to prevent the facilitation of a UK tax evasion offence(s) (UK tax evasion facilitation offence)
CFA 2017, s 46 creates the offence of failing to prevent the facilitation of a foreign tax evasion offence(s) (foreign tax evasion facilitation offence)
Both are strict liability offences, subject to a ‘reasonable procedures’ defence available to those who can prove that they have maintained reasonable procedures intended to prevent the facilitation of the underlying tax evasion offences. Further to providing some background, this Practice Note sets out the elements of the two offences as well as the defences created by CFA 2017.
Both offences came into force on 30 September 2017. Organisations falling within the scope of the offences should be able to show that they were developing and/or enhancing their reasonable prevention procedures in advance of the implementation of these offences.
UK prosecutors are likely to receive greater assistance from foreign investigators and prosecutors in respect of these offences, than had been the case in Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) investigations. Foreign governments may will feel incentivised to co-operate with the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) or National Crime Agency (NCA)
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
Defects liability period and rectification of defectsIt is common in construction projects for defects to manifest or appear in the works. Most construction contracts require the contractor to return to site to rectify (also known as ‘make good’) defects which arise or are discovered during a
Convention rights—structure of qualified rightsThe rights preserved under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as set out in the Human Rights Act 1998 Sch 1, can be broadly divided into three groups:•absolute rights—which cannot be interfered with by the state or derogated from even in a
Liquidated damages in construction contractsThis Practice Note explains what liquidated and ascertained damages (LADs/LDs) are and their purpose in a building contract. It considers the difference between liquidated damages and general (or unliquidated) damages and looks at the enforceability of
No deal Brexit—jurisdiction (UK and the Lugano Convention) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note has been produced in partnership with Guy Pendell, Liz Williams and Kushal Gandhi of CMS.This Practice Note covers the situation where the UK
0330 161 1234