Table of contents
- Disagreements between the architect’s foundation and her practice
- No bilateral termination rights in licence agreement
- Restraint of trade doctrine inapplicable
Article summary
Commercial analysis: In Zaha Hadid Ltd v The Zaha Hadid Foundation, the High Court confirmed that agreements of indefinite duration would not necessarily be interpreted to include bilateral termination rights and that the absence of such rights did not mean the relevant agreements operated in restraint of trade. Written by Oliver Dutton, trainee at A&O Shearman.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial