Boilerplate clauses

Boilerplate clauses

This subtopic focuses on boilerplate clauses in commercial business-to-business agreements. For information on commercial clauses more generally, see: Commercial clauses—overview.

For information on boilerplate in business-to-consumer contracts, see the section on ‘Consumer boilerplate’ below.

For information on boilerplate in public sector contracts, see the section on ‘Public sector boilerplate’ below.

The role of boilerplate

Lawyers work on a huge variety of transactions, but all of them will in some way involve written agreements. All of those agreements should contain some boilerplate clauses.

‘Boilerplate’ is the term used to describe the clauses that are included in an agreement to deal with the mechanics of how it works and those legal points that are relevant to most transactions. For further consideration of the role and importance of boilerplate clauses, see Practice Note: The role of boilerplate.

Boilerplate clauses are generally found at the beginning and the end of an agreement. Such clauses are often thought of as standard, miscellaneous provisions, but this is a very dangerous view to adopt. It is not unusual for a boilerplate clause to be the cause of litigation. Since a boilerplate clause

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Commercial News

Weekly roundup of HMRC import, export and customs guidance—8 September 2025

Details of updates to HMRC import, export and customs guidance for the period from 2 to 8 September 2025.

Commission fines Google €2.95bn for abuse of dominance in the adtech sector

The European Commission has imposed a fine of €2.95bn on Google for breaching Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU. The Commission found that Google abused its dominant position in the advertising technology markets by systematically favouring its own ad exchange, AdX, through its publisher ad server (DFP) and ad buying tools (Google Ads and DV360). This practice, which has been ongoing since at least 2014, distorted competition and reinforced Google's market power. Google is required to end these self-preferencing behaviours and address the structural conflicts of interest within its adtech operations, submitting proposed remedies within 60 days. The Commission noted that, should Google's proposals prove inadequate, further measures including divestment may be imposed. The fine was calculated in view of the severity and duration of the infringement, AdX’s turnover, and Google's prior history of similar violations. This decision is made in parallel with an investigation by the US Department of Justice, with a related trial scheduled for 22 September 2025.

EHRC submits updated services Code of Practice to Minister for Women and Equalities

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has shared its updated statutory Code of Practice for services, public functions and associations with the Minister for Women and Equalities for approval. Following ministerial approval, the government must lay the draft Code before Parliament for 40 days before it can be brought into force.

Guaranteed failure (Peter Dunn v Kostas Kazolides)

Commercial analysis: Dov Ohrenstein of Radcliffe Chambers considers the case of Peter Dunn v Kostas Kazolides which addresses interesting questions about limitation periods, insolvency, the formal requirements for the execution of deeds, and how variation to the contract between the principal debtor and creditor may discharge a guarantor.