The following PI & Clinical Negligence practice note Produced in partnership with Andrew Wilson provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Note: This Practice Note is relevant only to Part 36 offers as considered under CPR 36 in force as from 6 April 2015. For offers made prior to this, see Practice Note: Part 36 Offers—pre-6 April 2015 [Archived].
The purpose and use of Part 36 offers remain very much as they have been since their inception: to encourage negotiation and resolution of claims or at least of issues in dispute between parties to claims.
Where the claimant has an admission from the defendant or judgment for damages to be assessed, a well-pitched Part 36 offer from the defendant will ensure that the claimant and their representatives have to give close consideration to the ultimate value of the claim.
With the introduction of qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) in personal injury cases, Part 36 offers have become an even more important part of the defendant practitioner’s armoury, as a means of applying costs pressure on claimants. See Practice Note: Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS).
With the costs, damages and interest penalties provided by Part 36, there are a number of good reasons for a claimant to make well-pitched Part 36 offers to put the defendant under pressure.
Part 36 offers can be made at any stage of a dispute including before proceedings are commenced. They are also sometimes made even after there has been
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what,
An intention to create legal relations is requiredThere are various situations in which a court will hold that an agreement is not binding because, though supported by consideration, it was made without any intention of creating legal relations (see, eg, Blue v Ashley).Did the parties intend to
Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not
IntroductionA defendant may decide to make a submission of no case to answer after the claimant has indicated that it has closed its case and before the defendant calls any evidence. It is only done where the defendant is extremely confident that the claimant has not presented the court with
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.