Joined Cases T- 539/12 Ziegler v Commission and T- 150/13 Ziegler Relocation v Commission (action for non-contractual liability) [Archived]

Published by a LexisNexis Competition expert
Practice notes

Joined Cases T- 539/12 Ziegler v Commission and T- 150/13 Ziegler Relocation v Commission (action for non-contractual liability) [Archived]

Published by a LexisNexis Competition expert

Practice notes
imgtext

CASE HUB

ARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 15 January 2015; it is no longer maintained.

See further: timeline and related/relevant cases

Case facts

OutlineAction for damages brought by Ziegler before the General Court, seeking actions for compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants following the infringement finding and fine imposed on Ziegler for its participation in a cartel for the supply of international removal services in Belgium on the alleged basis that the European Union is partly responsible for the confirmed infringement, in particular, due to cover quotes requested by commission officials for their international removals and relocations.
PartiesApplicants:• Ziegler SA (Ziegler)• Ziegler Relocation SA (Ziegler Relocation)Defendant: European Commission Ziegler Relocation is a subsidiary of Ziegler. Since 2003, Ziegler Relocation is the company within the Ziegler group that is responsible for carrying out removal services. Ziegler Relocation has conducted international removals, including for officials and other members of the European Commission.
BackgroundOn
Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Key definition:
Commission definition
What does Commission mean?

In the context of the bribery Act 2010, a commission is the giving of a financial advantage, although it is not necessarily a bribe.

Popular documents