Court of Justice—national references

View Competition by content type:

Latest Competition News

Featured Competition content

Practice notes
A conversation with Peter Harper, partner, Annabel Borg, principal associate PSL and Claire Morgan, principal associate, in the London office of...
Read More >
Produced in partnership with Eversheds Sutherland LLP 12th Jan
Practice notes
Economic transactions carried out by Member States do not confer an advantage in favour of an undertaking, and therefore do not constitute State aid...
Read More >
Produced in partnership with CMS 12th Jan
Practice notes
A conversation with David Fruitman, regional competition counsel and senior consultant at regional law firm DFDL on key issues on merger control in...
Read More >
Produced in partnership with DFDL 12th Jan
Practice notes
This Practice Note makes frequent references to two legal instruments issued by the European Commission that are designed to assist parties and their...
Read More >
Produced in partnership with Suzanne Rab of Serle Court 12th Jan
Practice notes
Article 102 TFEU prohibits undertakings which hold a dominant position within the EU or a substantial part of it from abusing that dominant position,...
Read More >
Produced in partnership with Suzanne Rab of Serle Court 12th Jan
Practice notes
Competition concerns relating to collective dominance and oligopolies may be dealt with in various ways under EU and UK competition laws:•Article 101...
Read More >
Produced in partnership with Herbert Smith Freehills 12th Jan
Practice notes
A conversation with Sami Kallel, at partner Tunisian law firm Kallel & Associates, on key issues on merger control in Tunisia.NOTE–to see whether...
Read More >
Produced in partnership with Kallel & Associates 12th Jan

Most recent Court of Justice—national references content

Practice notes
CASE HUBSee further, timeline and related/relevant cases.Case factsOutlineCase C- 308/19 Whitleland Import Export—a national reference from Romania...
Read More >
22nd Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 16 July 2015; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 26 November 2015; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 4 December 2014; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 20 November 2011; it is no longer maintained.Case facts...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 23 October 2014; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 30 January 2020; it is no longer maintained.See further,...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUB ARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 13 December 2012; it is no longer maintained.See...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUB ARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the decision of 14 November 2017; it is no longer maintained.See...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the decision of 28 July 2016; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUB ARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 14 March 2013; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 7 February 2013; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 17 February 2011; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the decision of 5 July 2018; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 18 July 2013; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the decision of 7 September 2017; it is no longer maintained.See further,...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 6 October 2015; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUB ARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the decision of 7 July 2016; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the decision of 6 December 2017 ; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan
Practice notes
CASE HUBARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 21 May 2015; it is no longer maintained.See further:...
Read More >
20th Jan

Popular documents