The following PI & Clinical Negligence practice note Produced in partnership with David Willink of Lamb Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The usual mechanisms for funding a clinical negligence claim are:
legal aid/public funding
conditional fee agreement (CFA)
Various cases have considered whether it was reasonable to switch from legal aid funding to a CFA. In Surrey v Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals, the Court of Appeal decided that the decision to switch funding from legal aid was unreasonable because the advice provided to the claimants exaggerated the disadvantages of remaining with legal aid funding and had failed to mention the forfeiture of the Simmons v Castle 10% uplift in general damages.
In XDE, the Court of Appeal held that Surrey was not limited to cases where the Simmons uplift applied and that the examination of the reasons to change the method of funding was of general application.
Any solicitor challenged on the reasons for switching funding must produce a witness statement explaining the decision in detail.
Since 1 April 2013, legal aid for clinical negligence claims is only available in the case of:
suffering severe disability
through negligence causing neurological injury
between conception and eight weeks post-birth
the key is the date of the negligence, not of the injury. For example, cognitive disabilities presenting later in life are still potentially within scope
the negligence need not be in the treatment of the child; negligent treatment of a third party (for example, the mother)
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note examines why parties involved in a construction project may enter into an escrow agreement (or escrow deed) to set up an escrow account. It looks at the benefits of paying funds into escrow, how an escrow account operates and the provisions typically found in an escrow
Unlike many other countries, the UK has no unfair competition law. Brand owners seeking to prevent competitors from marketing ‘copycat’ products or using misleading advertising have to rely on a combination of different intellectual property rights. These rights include the common law right to
LiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will in practice be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary of State for
This Practice Note provides a high-level introduction to diversity and inclusion (D&I) and key reasons why it is important to law firms. Specific aspects of D&I are covered in more detail in Practice Notes:•The growing focus on diversity and inclusion (D&I) in law firms•Unconscious bias—law
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.