Clinical negligence claims—funding and costs
Produced in partnership with David Willink of Lamb Chambers
Practice notesClinical negligence claims—funding and costs
Produced in partnership with David Willink of Lamb Chambers
Practice notesFunding
The usual mechanisms for funding a clinical Negligence claim are:
- •
Legal aid/public funding
- •
conditional fee agreement (CFA)
- •
after the event (ATE) insurance
- •
before the event (BTE) insurance
- •
Damages-based agreement (DBA)
Various cases have considered whether it was reasonable to switch from legal aid funding to a CFA. In Surrey v Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals, the Court of Appeal decided that the decision to switch funding from legal aid was unreasonable because the advice provided to the claimants exaggerated the disadvantages of remaining with legal aid funding and had failed to mention the forfeiture of the Simmons v Castle 10% uplift in general damages.
In XDE, the Court of Appeal held that Surrey was not limited to cases where the Simmons uplift applied and that the examination of the reasons to change the method of funding was of general application.
Any solicitor challenged on the reasons for switching funding must produce a witness statement explaining the decision in detail.
Legal aid
Since 1
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.