Damages

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

NOTE: On 2 December 2024, the Lord Chancellor announced that the discount rate would change to positive 0.5%. The positive 0.5% discount rate is effective from 11 January 2025. Schedule A1 to the Damages Act 1996 provides that subsequent reviews are to take place within five years of the conclusion of the previous review, which means that the next review must commence on or before 2 December 2029.

Damages

When assessing damages, it will not always be as straightforward as attributing all of the claimant’s ongoing medical problems to the alleged negligence. You must ascertain the actual damage caused by the defendant’s negligence. Assessment will be simpler if the claimant suffered no relevant pre-existing problems and the treatment should have fixed the injury, eg timely treatment of a wrist fracture in a young healthy patient. However, assessment can be significantly more complex if there were pre-existing problems that were likely to impact on the claimant in any event, eg osteoarthritis or mental health issues, or if the incident exacerbated or expedited the onset of other conditions.

For further guidance, see Practice Note: Damages in

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest PI & Clinical Negligence News

Unfair prejudice—removing parties and avoiding back-door company claims (Farnsworth v Chave)

Dispute Resolution analysis: This judgment considers the ‘desirability’ test for removing parties under CPR 19.2(3), in particular as applied to the removal of respondents from an unfair prejudice petition. The judge emphasised that third parties should not remain as respondents where they were not concerned in the conduct of the company’s affairs and no substantive relief is sought against them. The claim for authorisation under section 996(2)(c) of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) to bring civil proceedings in the Company’s name had little utility on the facts, given both sides sought a buy-out that would leave the petitioner in control. The court also cautioned against unfair prejudice proceedings being used to procure findings that would effectively pre-determine separate company claims. To the extent that the parties had in their possession documents that should be disclosed the judge considered that these could, and should, be obtained pursuant to CPR 31.17.

Supreme Court upholds costs award in sterling (Process & Industrial Developments Ltd v The Federal Republic of Nigeria)

The UK Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed Process & Industrial Developments Ltd’s (P&ID) appeal against a costs order made in favour of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Nigeria). The court held that the Commercial Court and Court of Appeal were correct to award costs in sterling rather than in Nigeria’s national currency, the naira. It ruled that costs orders are discretionary and not compensatory in nature like damages awards and that it was appropriate to make the order in the currency in which Nigeria incurred and paid its legal expenses. The court found no error in law in the lower court’s decision and noted that there was no resulting ’windfall' to Nigeria despite currency fluctuations. Duarte G. Henriques of Victoria Associates, Nikki Hussey of Eversheds Sutherland and Elizabeth Kantor of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer comment on the implications of the judgment.

Firms in 'purgatory' as regulators respond to Mazur fallout

Law360, London: A recent court ruling that trainees and paralegals cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision, has left some firms 'in purgatory' as they grapple with a judgment that, lawyers warn, could make swathes of work unviable.

SCCO publishes the 2025 Senior Courts Costs Office guide

The Senior Courts Costs Office (SCCO) has published its 2025 edition of the Senior Courts Costs Office guide, providing updated procedural and substantive guidance on the assessment of legal costs in civil, family and certain criminal proceedings across England and Wales. The guide reflects current practice under the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) across the County Court, High Court and Court of Appeal. It also covers solicitor-client assessments under the Solicitors Act 1974 (SA 1974), Court of Protection cases and appeals from costs officers and determining officers.

View PI & Clinical Negligence by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of caseA strike out order can be made either following an application by the parties or on the court's own initiative. This Practice Note deals with the scenario of the order being made following a party's application.Making an application

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an

Temporary repatriation facility—FAQs

Temporary repatriation facility—FAQsFor a summary of the changes to the taxation of non-domiciled individuals and the abolition of the remittance basis of taxation from 6 April 2025, see Practice Note: The abolition of the remittance basis of taxation from 2025–26. For information on the remittance
Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of case

Strike out—making an application to strike out a statement of caseA strike out order can be made either following an application by the parties or on the court's own initiative. This Practice Note deals with the scenario of the order being made following a party's application.Making an application

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an

Temporary repatriation facility—FAQs

Temporary repatriation facility—FAQs

Temporary repatriation facility—FAQsFor a summary of the changes to the taxation of non-domiciled individuals and the abolition of the remittance basis of taxation from 6 April 2025, see Practice Note: The abolition of the remittance basis of taxation from 2025–26. For information on the remittance