Liability

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Duty of care

The following issues need to be considered in every clinical negligence claim:

A medical practitioner owes a duty of care to their patient. This duty is to take reasonable care to:

  1. •

    take a proper history

  2. •

    investigate the patient’s symptoms and complaints properly

  3. •

    make proper differential diagnoses

  4. •

    make any necessary referrals to specialists

  5. •

    initiate action in order to take all reasonable steps to procure the health of the patient

  6. •

    provide a reasonable course of treatment

  7. •

    follow up with the patient afterwards if that is reasonably necessary

There are two elements to establishing breach of duty of care:

  1. •

    firstly, determining the appropriate standard of care, and

  2. •

    secondly, proving that the conduct in question fell below that standard

The claimant has the burden of establishing breach of duty resulting in injury on the balance of probabilities.

For further guidance, see Practice Note: Duty of care and breach in clinical negligence claims.

Causation

An injury resulting from clinical negligence does not automatically mean a claimant will be awarded

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest PI & Clinical Negligence News

PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights—18 December 2025

This week’s edition of PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights includes analysis of recent decisions on credit hire and impecuniosity in the context of debarring orders, the treatment of consent orders as judgments for Part 36 costs consequences and criminal injuries compensation where a change in understanding is not a material change in medical condition. We also bring you research from APIL challenging the fairness of current whiplash reforms and the Supreme Court’s approach to public interest immunity in inquests. In addition, we have our usual round-up of other news, cases, free and on-demand webinars and New Law Journal articles of interest.

AvMA publishes final Harmed Patient Pathway to improve after-harm care

Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA), in collaboration with the Harmed Patients Alliance (HPA), has published the final version of the Harmed Patient Pathway (HPP). The Pathway aims to provide clearer, more compassionate and coherent responses to harmed patients, addressing concerns raised in Dr Penny Dash’s 2025 review about the complaints process and fragmented support for those who have suffered harm or poor outcomes. The HPP offers a practical, values-driven framework, and discussions on its implementation are ongoing across the UK and Ireland, with updates to follow as progress develops.

UK government will legislate to reverse PACCAR

Law360, London: The government announced plans on 17 December 2025 to introduce legislation to resolve the uncertainty around third-party litigation funding in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's PACCAR decision, ending months of speculation.

Supreme Court applies Public Interest Immunity in an inquest and overturns potential disclosure of gists (In the matter of an application by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland for Judicial Review (Appellant))

The UK Supreme Court has unanimously held that decisions on Public Interest Immunity (PII) involve a substantive question of law requiring courts to determine where the overall public interest lies, rather than applying ordinary public law review standards. In a case concerning the inquest into the 1994 death of Liam Paul Thompson in Belfast, the Court ruled that neither of two gists of sensitive information should be disclosed. It found that the Coroner erred by failing to apply the correct balancing test, disregarding the Secretary of State’s assessment of national security risks, and omitting key procedural steps. The judgment emphasises that appellate courts must form their own view on disclosure and conduct the Wiley PII balancing exercise. The appeal was allowed, with the Supreme Court noting that a statutory inquiry or review by the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery would be more appropriate given the statutory deadline and security concerns. Ian Gascoigne comments on the public interest immunity aspect at the core of the appeal.

View PI & Clinical Negligence by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Temporary repatriation facility—FAQs

Temporary repatriation facility—FAQsFor a summary of the changes to the taxation of non-domiciled individuals and the abolition of the remittance basis of taxation from 6 April 2025, see Practice Note: The abolition of the remittance basis of taxation from 2025–26. For information on the remittance

What are the rules for validly serving a section 27 Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 notice on the landlord

What are the rules for validly serving a section 27 Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 notice on the landlord outside of the UK?There are various rules which govern when a section 27 notice can be served and what information needs to be included which are outside the scope of this Q&A. Notice may be
Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Temporary repatriation facility—FAQs

Temporary repatriation facility—FAQs

Temporary repatriation facility—FAQsFor a summary of the changes to the taxation of non-domiciled individuals and the abolition of the remittance basis of taxation from 6 April 2025, see Practice Note: The abolition of the remittance basis of taxation from 2025–26. For information on the remittance

What are the rules for validly serving a section 27 Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 notice on the landlord

What are the rules for validly serving a section 27 Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 notice on the landlord

What are the rules for validly serving a section 27 Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 notice on the landlord outside of the UK?There are various rules which govern when a section 27 notice can be served and what information needs to be included which are outside the scope of this Q&A. Notice may be