Case C- 307/18 Generics (UK) Ltd and Others v CMA [Archived]
Published by a LexisNexis Competition expert
Practice notesCase C- 307/18 Generics (UK) Ltd and Others v CMA [Archived]
Published by a LexisNexis Competition expert
Practice notesCASE HUB
ARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 30 January 2020; it is no longer maintained.
See further, timeline, commentary and related/relevant cases.
Case facts
Outline | Case C- 307/18 Generics (UK) Ltd and Others v Competition and Markets Authority—a national reference from the UK concerning the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU in relation to pay for delay patent settlement agreements. |
Latest developments | .On 30 January 2020, the Court of Justice issued its judgment. The Court of Justice closely followed the Opinion of Advocate General Kokott, confirming (amongst other things) that such agreements may constitute a restriction of competition by object or effect and/or an abuse of a dominant position. |
Parties | Applicants:• Generics (UK) Ltd (GUK)• GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK)• Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS (Xellia)• Alpharma LLL (formerly Zoetis Products LLC (Alpharma) and• Merck KGaA (Merk)Defendant:Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) |
Market | Pharmacuticals—anti-depressant medicines, namely paracetine. |
Background to reference | CMA’s decisionOn 12 February 2016, the CMA issued its infringement decision in GlaxoSmithKline and others |
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.