Case C- 10/18 P Marine Harvest v Commission (failure to notify) [Archived]
Published by a LexisNexis Competition expert
Practice notesCase C- 10/18 P Marine Harvest v Commission (failure to notify) [Archived]
Published by a LexisNexis Competition expert
Practice notesCASE HUB
ARCHIVED–this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgments of 4 March 2020; it is no longer maintained.
See further, timeline, commentary and related/similar cases.
Case facts
Outline | Case C- 10/18 P Marine Harvest v Commission—appeal to the Court of Justice against the judgment of the General Court dismissing an action for Annulment of the Commission’s decision fining Marine Harvest for the failure to notify its acquisition of control over Morpol and failure to comply with the standstill obligation. |
Latest development | On 4 March 2020, the Court of Justice issued its judgment, dismissing the appeal and upholding the Commission’s decision. |
Parties | Applicant: Marine Harvest. Defendant: European Commission Marine Harvest (now called Mowi), is a Norwegian seafood company which produces farmed salmon, white halibut and various other seafood products. It has salmon farming and primary processing activities in Norway, Chile, Scotland, Canada, Ireland and the Faroe Islands. Morpol was a Norwegian-based producer and processor of salmon. It had salmon farming and primary processing activities in Norway and Scotland. |
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.