Competition law and commercial agreements

This subtopic contains guidance on EU level rules relating to competition law and commercial agreements.

The European Commission is wary of any arrangements which might restrict competition. Several types of commercial agreements may raise competition law concerns, such as:

•
horizontal agreements
•
vertical agreements

Analysing horizontal agreements under Article 101 TFEU

Horizontal agreements may involve arrangements between competitors. A key proposition underpinning EU competition law is that competing companies should act independently on markets. Horizontal cooperation can be beneficial for consumers and markets but involving competitors will be of particular concern from an EU competition law perspective where there is coordination on certain sensitive parameters (eg price and/or output) or where the cooperation enables collaborating parties with already strong market positions to gain, maintain or increase market power.

Practice Note: Analysing horizontal cooperation agreements under EU competition law considers the key EU competition rules to be borne in mind when drafting or reviewing a horizontal agreement between actual or potential competitors. The Practice Note sets out a process for assessing whether a horizontal agreement might be anti-competitive and the possibilities for exemption

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest EU Law News

European Commission releases December 2025 infringement package

The European Commission has published the December 2025 infringement package, which sets out the EU Member States the Commission is taking action against for failing to comply with their obligations under EU law. The December 2025 package includes letters of formal notice, reasoned opinions, and Court of Justice referrals issued to Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Austria and others across a range of policy areas, including environmental protection (water, waste, air quality, nature), public procurement, services, free movement, firearms, media freedom, child protection, energy and climate, taxation, customs, transport, financial services and competition.

Zalando loses its challenge against EU DSA VLOP designation

TMT analysis: On 3 September 2025, the General Court of the European Union delivered the first major judicial interpretation of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, the EU Digital Services Act (EU DSA) in its dismissal of Zalando’s challenge against its designation as a ‘very large online platform’ (VLOP) under the EU DSA. Zalando’s argument had focussed on the fact that its e-commerce platform is a hybrid service, via which the Berlin-based fashion retailer sells its own products (not an activity regulated by the EU DSA), as well as allowing third-party partners to market products (an activity that is in-scope of the EU DSA). Zalando argued that this means that users who use the platform only to buy directly from Zalando, and not to engage with listings by third-party partners, should not be counted when assessing whether the platform meets the EU DSA’s user number threshold to qualify as a VLOP. This case has captured widespread attention, not only due to its impact on Zalando but also because the decision affects how all in-scope hybrid platform providers should count, and report on, their user numbers, and how likely such providers are to qualify as VLOPs. Written by Catherine O’Callaghan of Slaughter and May.

EU Law weekly highlights—11 December 2025

This week's edition of EU Law weekly highlights includes analyses on the impact of a Court of Justice ruling on operators of online marketplaces and their EU GDPR obligations, the Advocate General’s opinion on trade mark invalidity when marks are of such a nature as to deceive the public, the Court of Justice judgment on eligibility of utilitarian objects for copyright protection, the Digital Omnibus and key considerations for the life sciences sector, and questions from Member States on the planned delay for EU AI Act. In addition this week, the European Commission adopted a financial services market integration package, published the Environmental Simplification Omnibus, the European Grids Package and Energy Highways initiative, launched a public consultation on revising EU rules addressing unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships within the agricultural and food supply chain, the Council of the EU and European Parliament reached provisional agreements to significantly narrow the scope of EU sustainability reporting and due diligence rules, as well to amend the EU Deforestation Regulation and the European Climate Law, the European Data Protection Board adopted recommendations clarifying the legal basis for requiring user account creation on e-commerce websites, the EIOPA launched consultations and published guidance as part of the Solvency II review and the Commission unveiled its Quality Jobs Roadmap, a strategic plan to ensure high-quality, future-proof employment across the EU.