Directors' and members' issues

It is very important that directors and members are well-advised once a company gets into financial difficulties, and especially once it tips over into insolvency. Directors will need to be aware of their various duties to shareholders and creditors, while shareholders will want to try to keep the company out of insolvency to keep their equity alive.

Directors' issues

Directors of companies which become, or are likely to become, insolvent are under a duty to maximise the return to the company's creditors. The relevant statutory provisions are contained in:

  1. the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), and

  2. the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986

Pre-insolvency, the directors must also abide by the general duties set out in the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). The three most relevant to companies in financial difficulties include:

  1. the duty to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole

  2. the duty to exercise independent judgment, and

  3. the duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence

When a company becomes financially distressed, and formal insolvency proceedings become more likely, the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Corporate News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Corporate by content type :

Popular documents