Trend Reports

Market Standards is a unique service for corporate lawyers housed within the Corporate module. At the heart of the product is a transaction database, with deal summaries of over 8,000 listed company transactions. The deal summaries provide detailed analysis of key transaction features, highlighting relevant material in the underlying deal documentation. The database also allows for monitoring ongoing deal activity and tracking emerging trends and developments via our e-mail alert function. To access the Market Standards deal analysis comparator tool click here.

The Market Standards trend reports look at developments across key areas for publicly listed companies, including public M&A, equity capital markets and corporate governance. The trend reports combine data extracted from our transaction database, with an overview of the legal and regulatory framework, upcoming developments, analysis of key transactions and commentary on market trends from our team of corporate lawyers and analysts. The trend reports also include market insight and practical guidance from a wide range of highly regarded practitioners. The archive of trend reports includes:

2024 trend reports

In 2024, we published the following trend reports:

  1. Public M&A deals H1 2024—UK—Market Standards Trend Report

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Corporate News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Corporate by content type :

Popular documents