Main Market resources

This subtopic contains resource notes which highlight relevant commentary, analysis and resources to assist with the interpretation of and provide practical guidance on the UK Listing Rules, the previous Listing Rules, the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, the Prospectus Regulation Rules, the Prospectus Regulation and the Market Abuse Regulation. It also contains trackers which summarise legislative and regulatory developments in relation to the these sourcebooks, the UK Prospectus Regulation and other relevant resources.

Reform of the UK listing and prospectus regime

A significant restructuring of the UK listing regime came into effect on 29 July 2024 which included the removal of the premium and standard listing segments and the creation of a single listing category for equity shares in commercial companies which sits alongside other listing categories such as the shell companies, secondary listing, transition and closed ended investment fund categories. The UK Listing Rules sourcebook came into force to implement the changes and the previous Listing Rules sourcebook was revoked.

Following a Treasury consultation on the prospectus regime, The Public Offers and Admissions to Trading Regulations 2024 (POATR) were made in January 2024. These regulations provide

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Corporate News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Corporate by content type :

Popular documents