Companies Acts resources

The Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) embodies the most wide-ranging reform of company law in over 35 years. It replaced the Companies Act 1985 (CA 1985) as the key UK company law statute and, while to a large extent CA 2006 restates the law as in force under CA 1985, it also contains significant changes to it.

For more information on the background to CA 2006, see Practice Note: Companies Act 2006—history and approach to implementation.

Implementation of CA 2006

CA 2006 was brought into force on a staggered basis over a period of around three years and its final provisions came into effect on 1 October 2009. There were several implementation dates between (and including) 8 November 2006 and 1 October 2009 and Practice Note:

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Corporate News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Corporate by content type :

Popular documents