UK merger control

If a transaction falls within the scope of the UK merger rules under the Enterprise Act 2002, as amended by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (ERRA 2013) and the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA), the parties may choose to notify the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) or the CMA may decide to investigate itself. If, after an investigation, the CMA has competition concerns, it can prohibit the transaction (or unwind it if it is a completed transaction), accept remedies from the parties or (at phase 2) impose remedies that address those concerns.

When will a transaction fall within the UK merger rules

The DMCCA made several changes to the merger control thresholds. There are now three alternative thresholds—the turnover test, the share of supply test and a hybrid test—one of which must be met for a transaction to fall within the scope of the UK merger control rules.

A transaction will fall within the UK merger rules if it is a 'relevant merger situation', meaning:

  1. two or more enterprises (or businesses) must 'cease to be distinct', and

  2. the target's

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Competition News

Competition weekly highlights—26 February 2026

This week’s edition of Competition weekly highlights includes, from a UK perspective: (1) the CMA’s interim report in relation to its Getty Images/Shutterstock phase 2 investigation, (2) the government’s issuance of a pre-emptive action order following a PIIN in relation to DMGT/Telegraph Media Group, (3) the CMA’s response to DBT’s working paper on options for reform of non-compete clauses in employment contracts, (4) the EU/UK signing an agreement to co-operate closely on competition matters, (5) the Business Secretary announcing that Doug Gurr has been selected as preferred candidate to remain as Chair of the CMA, (6) the CAT’s judgment on a strike-out application and expert evidence in relation to a collective damages action brought by Ad Tech against Google, and (7) a CAT ruling refusing permission to appeal in a claim alleging competition law breaches by Faculty of Advocates Services. This week’s highlights also includes, from an EU perspective: (1) publication by the Commission of a summary of consultation responses on the ongoing review of the FSR, (2) publication by the Commission of consultation responses received to the review of Regulation 1/2003, (3) the Commission launching a consultation on the draft new State aid General Block Exemption Regulation, (4) publication of the European Parliament’s resolution on the Commission’s 2024 Competition Policy report, and (5) the General Court’s judgment dismissing an action challenging the Commission’s refusal of access to DMA designation documents.

View Competition by content type :

Popular documents