Is it a notifiable concentration?

If a transaction falls within the scope of the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR), it will need to be notified to the European Commission (the Commission) and be cleared before the transaction can be completed. The Commission will investigate the transaction–if it has competition concerns, it can prohibit the transaction or accept remedies from the parties to address any concerns.

When will a transaction fall within the EUMR

A transaction will fall within the EUMR and require notification to the Commission if:

•
it is a ‘concentration’
•
the transaction is permanent, and
•
it meets the financial thresholds set out in the EUMR.

The EUMR defines a ‘concentration’ as follows:

•
where two independent businesses merge—this includes arrangements where previously 'independent' companies set up a common management team, or a dual listing on a Stock Exchange
•
the acquisition of control by one (or more) business over another, either
1. ◦
  one business gaining 'sole control' over the target business (this could be through a majority shareholding or a minority shareholding if there are also veto rights over key commercial decisions)
2. ◦
  two or more businesses gaining 'joint

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Competition News

EU Competition law—daily round-up (25/07/2025)

A round-up of EU competition law developments, including the latest State aid developments.

EU Competition law—daily round-up (24/07/2025)

A round-up of EU competition law developments, including (amongst other things) the Commission’s decision to launch an investigation into whether KKR provided incorrect or misleading information to the Commission during its 2024 merger investigation into KKR’s acquisition of NetCo.

Competition weekly highlights—24 July 2025

This week's edition of Competition weekly highlights includes, from a UK perspective: (1) a series of reforms to the NSI Act 2021, namely: (i) a consultation on proposed reforms to the Act’s mandatory notification regime, (ii) the Government’s intention to remove NSI notification requirements for internal reorganisations and insolvency appointments, and (iii) publication of the 2024–25 Annual Report, (2) the CMA’s decision that Aramark/Entier merger meets the test for reference to a phase 2, and (3) publication of the IWC’s final report on its review of the regulatory framework for the water sector in England and Wales, in which it recommends the abolition of Ofwat. This week's highlights also includes, from an EU perspective: the Commission’s decisions to: (1) issue an SO for potential breaches of Articles 4, 7 and 8 EUMR in the Vivendi/Lagardère merger, (2) the Commission’s decision to refer UMG/Downtown to phase II, (3) launch a consultation on draft FSR guidelines, and (4) accept commitments offered by Corning in its ‘Gorilla Glass’ abuse investigation.

UK Competition law—daily round-up (24/07/2025)

A round-up of UK competition law developments, including (amongst other things) (1) the CAT judgment dismissing for the second time a subsidy control challenge against a decision by Greater Manchester Combined Authority, (2) the Government publishes the Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Order and The Enterprise Act 2002 (Definition of Newspaper), (3) the CAT’s judgment granting CPOs for opt-out claims against Amazon, and (4) the CMA publishes guidance on its approach to how it will use its market powers in the coming years.