Is it a notifiable concentration?

If a transaction falls within the scope of the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR), it will need to be notified to the European Commission (the Commission) and be cleared before the transaction can be completed. The Commission will investigate the transaction–if it has competition concerns, it can prohibit the transaction or accept remedies from the parties to address any concerns.

When will a transaction fall within the EUMR

A transaction will fall within the EUMR and require notification to the Commission if:

•
it is a ‘concentration’
•
the transaction is permanent, and
•
it meets the financial thresholds set out in the EUMR.

The EUMR defines a ‘concentration’ as follows:

•
where two independent businesses merge—this includes arrangements where previously 'independent' companies set up a common management team, or a dual listing on a Stock Exchange
•
the acquisition of control by one (or more) business over another, either
1. ◦
  one business gaining 'sole control' over the target business (this could be through a majority shareholding or a minority shareholding if there are also veto rights over key commercial decisions)
2. ◦
  two or more businesses gaining 'joint

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Competition News

EU Competition law—daily round-up (13/06/2025)

A round-up of EU competition law developments, including (amongst other things) the Commission publishes a Revised Code of Best Practices for conduct of State aid control procedures.

EU Competition law—daily round-up (12/06/2025)

A round-up of EU competition law developments, including an AG opinion concerning a national reference from Portugal on interpretation of provisions in Damages Directive governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of competition law.

Competition weekly highlights—12 June 2025

This week's edition of Competition weekly highlights includes, from a UK perspective: (1) the CMA issues an interim report in the Spreadex/Sporting Index remittal merger and provisionally finds competition concerns, (2) the CMA launches a consultation on draft rules for a levy for the digital markets competition regime. This week's highlights also includes, from an EU perspective: (1) an AG opinion concerning a national reference from the Czech Republic seeking clarification as to whether a collective management organisation’s failure to account for hotel room occupancy when setting copyright royalties for licensed works constitutes a breach of Article 102 TFEU, (2) an AG opinion concerning a national reference from Sweden seeking clarification as to whether compensation provided to a company owned by a Swedish municipality constitutes new or existing aid, and (3) the Commission launches a consultation on a revision of the SGEI State aid rules to address the issue of housing affordability.